Tuesday briefing: Crystal Palace lose CAS appeal against UEFA
Tuesday briefing: Crystal Palace lose CAS appeal against UEFA
IMAGO
Villarreal vs FC Barcelona LaLiga match set to take place in Miami after RFEF approval
John Textor partners with football financier Keith Harris in bid to take over Sheffield Wednesday
UEFA has paid more than €10.8 million to Russian clubs since Ukraine invasion
12 August 2025 - 4:30 AM
Crystal Palace have lost their appeal against UEFA’s decision to demote the club to the Conference League for the 2025/26 season.
Last month, the Premier League club submitted their appeal with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), which has now upheld its initial ruling.
Palace, who had qualified for the Europa League, were deemed to have breached UEFA’s multi-club ownership regulations, which prohibit individuals from influencing multiple teams within the same competition. At the time, former Palace co-owner John Textor also had a stake in French club Olympique Lyon, who also qualified for the Europa League.
Although the US businessman has since sold his 43 per cent stake in the South London club to fellow US investor Woody Johnson, this came well after UEFA’s deadline of 1st March to make changes to ownership structures.
During last week’s hearing in Lausanne, the club argued that they had been subject to unfair treatment by UEFA, and claimed that despite the presence of Textor within both teams through Eagle Football Holdings, they were to run as a multi-club organisation. This was however refuted by CAS’ ruling on Monday.
CAS’ verdict
In a statement, CAS said: ‘After considering the evidence, the Panel found that John Textor, founder of Eagle Football Holdings, had shares in [Crystal Palace] and [Lyon] and was a Board member with decisive influence over both clubs at the time of UEFA's assessment date.
‘The panel also dismissed the argument by [Palace] that they received unfair treatment in comparison to Nottingham Forest and [Lyon]. The Panel considered that the UEFA Regulations are clear and do not provide flexibility to clubs that are non-compliant on the assessment date, as [Palace] claimed.
‘This was an expedited procedure, with an operative decision rendered two and a half weeks after the appeal, filed on July 21 2025. Unless Parties request confidentiality, a full Award (with grounds) will be made available on the CAS website in due course.’
Villarreal vs FC Barcelona LaLiga match set to take place in Miami after RFEF approval
Next season’s LaLiga matchup between Villarreal and Barcelona is set to be staged in Miami, following approval from the Spanish Football Federation (RFEF).
The RFEF’s board of directors gave the green light to proposals for the match to take place at Miami’s Hard Rock Stadium, and will contact FIFA to initiate the process for FIFA to allow the game to take place at the 65,326-seat venue.
According to Marca, both Villarreal and Barcelona are aware that the 21st December fixture is likely to be held in Miami, rather than at the La Ceramica Stadium in Villarreal.
FIFA and Relevent Sports settlement
In 2018, match promoter Relevent Sports filed a lawsuit against FIFA and US Soccer, after being prevented from bringing a LaLiga fixture between Barcelona and Girona to Miami.
Earlier this year, the longstanding legal dispute reached a settlement, opening up the possibility for domestic league matches to be held in the US.
John Textor partners with football financier Keith Harris in bid to take over Sheffield Wednesday
John Textor has partnered with football financier Keith Harris in his bid to takeover English club Sheffield Wednesday, according to The Guardian.
Harris has brokered takeovers of a number of English clubs in recent years, including West Ham United, Manchester City, and Aston Villa.
US businessman Textor recently confirmed his interest in investing in the Championship club, who have been embroiled in financial difficulties in recent months.
Wednesday’s financial woes
July marked the third successive month in which Wednesday failed to pay their players on time. Last month, several players subsequently handed in their notice in order to have their contracts terminated, with former manager Danny Rohl also leaving the club.
Despite the club’s ongoing financial struggles, the EFL confirmed last week that they would kick off the 2025/26 season with ‘no restrictions’, although they will remain under a transfer embargo until 2027.
UEFA has paid more than €10.8 million to Russian clubs since Ukraine invasion
UEFA has paid more than €10.8 million in solidarity payments to Russian clubs since the country’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, as reported by The Guardian.
European football’s governing body also did not provide solidarity payments for five Ukrainian clubs - Chornomorets, Real Pharma, IFC Metalurg, FSC Phoenix Mariupol, and FC Metalist - as they are allegedly located in a ‘zone of military operations’.
According to UEFA, solidarity funds are intended for teams that have not performed well enough domestically to qualify for UEFA competitions, as part of a plan to ‘maintain competitive balance’ in European football.
Although Russian clubs, as well as Russia’s national team, have been banned from international competitions since the invasion, UEFA reportedly provided €3.3 million to the Russian FA in 2022/23, followed by an additional €3.38 million in 2023/24, and €4.22 million the following season.
Ukrainian club directors on solidarity funds
In a joint statement shared by The Guardian, the directors of the aforementioned Ukrainian clubs said: ‘We have been informed that the obstacle to the above payments is some completely unclear requirements of a bank in Switzerland, which allegedly relate to the geographical location of the football clubs in the ‘war zone’.
‘We have not received any more detailed information or any legal justification for these restrictions on payments. The wording used in relation to the ‘zone of military operations’ is completely unclear to us and does not correspond to reality.
‘The zone of military operations, or rather the zone of military aggression of Russia, is not a specific region of our country, but the whole of Ukraine.’