Thursday briefing: Ceferin sure of Manchester City’s FFP guilt: ‘We know we were right’
Thursday briefing: Ceferin sure of Manchester City’s FFP guilt: ‘We know we were right’
IMAGO
INEOS and Ratcliffe’s remit at Manchester United to extend beyond football operations
Hellas Verona president Maurizio Setti’s appeal over police seizure of club’s shares rejected by court
Laporta claims LaLiga has been “corrupted” over Real Madrid VAR controversy
Nottingham Forest face potential difficulties over lack of relegation clauses in player contracts
25 January 2024 - 4:30 AM
UEFA president Aleksander Ceferin has claimed its disciplinary chiefs were “right” about Manchester City breaching its Financial Fair Play regulations when they handed out a two-year European ban back in February 2020 that was subsequently overturned.
In an interview with The Daily Telegraph, Ceferin was speaking for the first time since the Premier League revealed a date had been set for a hearing into its 115 charges against the Treble winners under its own rules.
Ceferin refused to be drawn on whether City – who deny any wrongdoing – should be stripped of titles if found guilty by an independent commission.
But asked if such a verdict would vindicate that of UEFA’s equivalent arm, the Club Financial Control Body, four years ago and the defence of its case at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), he replied: “We know we were right. We wouldn’t decide if we didn’t think we were right.”
Time barred
Ceferin stressed he respected the CAS decision, which overturned City’s suspension after ruling some of the evidence against them was time barred and that other accusations were unproven, while fining them €10 million for failing to cooperate with investigators.
“As a trial lawyer for 25 years, I know that, sometimes, you win a case that you are sure you will lose,” he said. “And, sometimes, you lose a case when you’re sure … You just simply have to respect in a serious democracy the decision of the court.”
He added: “I don’t want to speak about the case in England. But I trust that the decision of our independent body was correct.”
INEOS and Ratcliffe’s remit at Manchester United to extend beyond football operations
The remit for INEOS and Sir Jim Ratcliffe at Manchester United will reportedly include more than solely football operations, as initially outlined when the petrochemicals firm agreed to purchase a 25 per cent stake at the club last month.
According to The Athletic, United informed employees at an all-staff meeting held yesterday that INEOS and the Glazer family have reflected on previously agreed arrangements and recognised that the scope of the new investor’s influence will need to be more broadly defined.
It is understood Ratcliffe’s team will also liaise with the Glazers on business decisions as they, by definition, will impact the potential of football operations.
This will mean that the two ownership groups will need to align with one another on key decisions relating to the business, as dividing up affairs entirely is now felt to be unrealistic.
“Football first culture”
Those on the call, which was led by interim CEO Patrick Stewart, were also once again promised cultural change across United. Stewart emphasised the club is now committed to instilling a “football first culture”, in which all decisions made by the club hierarchy should be focused on “what’s best for football”.
However, the tone of the call was also said to convey that change is both necessary and coming, and this triggered some anxiety following previous reports that Ratcliffe wanted a review of the club’s staffing – an area that has long been considered by many in the industry as bloated.
Staff on the call, who spoke to The Athletic on the condition of anonymity in order to protect their jobs, interpreted the tone as one of change, with some fears that this may lead to a staffing review and potential job cuts.
Hellas Verona president Maurizio Setti’s appeal over police seizure of club’s shares rejected by court
The appeal of Hellas Verona president Maurizio Setti against the seizure of 100 per cent of the club’s shares by Italian police last month has been rejected by the Court of Review of Bologna, Italian media have reported.
The shares in the Serie A club controlled by their sole shareholder, Star Ball Srl, were seized by police as part of a bankruptcy investigation by the Italian law enforcement agency Guardia di Finanza, which was coordinated by the Bologna Public Prosecutor's Office.
The investigation found that Setti’s joint-stock company had gone bankrupt, but was previously a shareholder at the club, and that there were signs of misappropriation from the club’s current shareholders to the now bankrupt previous shareholding company.
Fake intra-group sale
In the proceedings that gave rise to the measure, Setti himself has also been investigated for fraudulent bankruptcy. The Hellas Verona owner has been accused of the fake intra-group sale of the club, which reportedly moved from H23 to Star Ball without consideration of money.
The reasons for the Bologna court’s rejection of Setti’s appeal have not yet been filed.
Laporta claims LaLiga has been “corrupted” over Real Madrid VAR controversy
FC Barcelona president Joan Laporta has claimed LaLiga has been “corrupted” amid the VAR controversy sparked by Real Madrid’s dramatic victory over Almería on Sunday.
In an interview with Catalan newspaper Mundo Deportivo, the Barça chief said he has made a formal complaint to the Spanish Football Federation (RFEF) after as many as three controversial calls went Real’s way during their 3-2 win.
Real Madrid TV, the club’s official media channel, has been posting videos criticising match officials and pointing out alleged mistakes made by them. Laporta said he had called on the RFEF to take action against the club for allegedly pressuring referees.
“Absolutely. That’s what I’ve told the president of the Spanish Federation,” he said. “He told me that what’s done is done and that they intend to take action.
“He also told me that the referees do not feel under pressure, he wanted to reassure me in this respect. I have absolute respect for the referees. I have said it and I say it unequivocally.”
He added: “But we are also seeing some situations that are worrying us a lot and if we continue like this, it will be very difficult for us to achieve our objectives. … You can’t adulterate the competition anymore with decisions like last Sunday’s at the Bernabéu.”
RFEF files police complaint over VAR leak
Meanwhile, the RFEF has filed a police complaint after audio of VAR deliberations in the match between Real Madrid and Almeria was leaked in the media.
Audio relating to a clash between Madrid winger Vinicius Junior and Almeria defender Alejandro Pozo was broadcast by online outlet Jijantes FC.
The audio seems to depict VAR official Alejandro Jose Hernandez Hernandez coming to the conclusion action should be considered against Vinicius Jr, without fully recommending to on-pitch referee Francisco Jose Hernandez Maeso that he do so.
In a statement, the RFEF said it was “extremely serious” that “audio-visual material” had been “extracted” and said it hoped “a response will be found as soon as possible to clarify responsibilities”.
Nottingham Forest face potential difficulties over lack of relegation clauses in player contracts
Nottingham Forest will face further financial challenges if they are relegated from the Premier League this season as many players in the squad do not have relegation clauses in their contracts, according to a report from The Daily Mail.
The newspaper has learned that a significant number of the 27 players who remain at Forest after signing since their promotion to the top-flight in May 2022 will not face mandatory pay-cuts if the club are relegated.
It is believed that Forest were able to insert relegation clauses into some of the contracts, but a number of players refused to accept them. As a result, the club will face significant liabilities if they go down at the end of the season, which is likely to result in a fire-sale of their highest earning players in the summer.
Fifty per cent pay cut
Relegation clauses are a common tool used by newly-promoted clubs to mitigate against the cost of returning to the EFL Championship. Although the level of pay cut varies it can be as much as 50 per cent.
Forest are currently four points clear of the relegation zone, but are facing the threat of a points deduction after being charged with breaching the Premier League’s profitability and sustainability rules last week.